More Notes On Immigration -- Riots In France

More Notes On Immigration -- Riots In France
  • In preparation for my immigration debate tomorrow, I have thought to study up on the recent riots that rocked the country of France from late June through the first two weeks of July.

  • These riots present an object lesson in what can happen in the event of large-scale immigration of an insular group that assimilates slowly into the host population and is culturally very different.

  • Although these riots have certainly been mentioned in the American press, they have mostly been kept out of the main headlines here by such things as the Supreme Court decisions of June 30, the Ukraine war, the emerging presidential campaign, the Biden family scandals (in the conservative press only), the ongoing climate scam (in the liberal press only) and so forth. But in France they were very significant.

Read More

Another Event To Attend In The New York Area

Another Event To Attend In The New York Area
  • After you have attended my debate Tuesday evening (July 25) at the Soho Forum, if you are looking for another event to attend in the New York area while you are in town, I have one for you. It’s the Queens Town Hall on LL97.

  • This one will take place on the very next night after my debate, July 26. The location is the Parish Center of the Queen of Angels Church in Sunnyside, Queens, at 43-18 Skillman Avenue. Time: 6:30 PM.

  • The organizer of this event is daughter Jane, who also contributes from time to time to this blog.

  • If you live anywhere near this site, and have any interest in this subject, we’d love to see you at the event.

Read More

Some Notes On Immigration

  • In preparation for my big Soho Forum debate a week from today, I’ve been doing some research to collect statistics relative to the subject of immigration, particularly as to the potential consequences of unlimited immigration into the U.S. Today I’ll share some of those statistics as a teaser for what you will get when you come to the debate.

  • The resolution for the debate is “The U.S. should have free immigration except for those who pose a security threat or have a serious contagious disease.” I have agreed to take the negative side of the resolution.

  • You might say that they have given me a ridiculously easy position to defend.

Read More

Come To The Soho Forum Debate On July 25

Come To The Soho Forum Debate On July 25
  • This is your chance to see the Manhattan Contrarian in a live debate!

  • On July 25, the Soho Forum will host a debate on the resolution “The U.S. should have free immigration except for those who pose a security threat or have a serious contagious disease.”

  • I will be taking the negative side of the debate.

  • We’d love to have a big attendance for this event.

Read More

The Latest News On New York's Socialist-Model Public Housing Provider, NYCHA

The Latest News On New York's Socialist-Model Public Housing Provider, NYCHA
  • There’s always something new to report on New York’s housing follies.

  • The accepted housing paradigm here in blue-model New York is that elite public policy geniuses with access to infinite taxpayer funds will create housing solutions to provide perfect housing fairness and justice to all. Somehow, they keep falling short.

  • Nowhere is this more evident that with the New York City Housing Authority, or NYCHA. NYCHA is the ultimate socialist-model low income housing provider, by far the largest such housing authority in the country. It owns and manages about 180,000 apartments in what are known as The Projects, home to something in the range of 400,000-500,000 people, or about 5-6% of New York City’s population. (In most other American cities, HUD-supported projects house about 1-2% of the population.) For decades, as housing authorities in places like Chicago and St. Louis were forced to dynamite many of their failed low-income projects, NYCHA was held up as the great success story of the genre.

  • But was the apparent success real, or was NYCHA just more artful than its compatriots in covering up its failures?

Read More

CHECC Has Petitioned The DC Circuit For Rehearing As To Its Standing To Challenge The Endangerment Finding

CHECC Has Petitioned The DC Circuit For Rehearing As To Its Standing To Challenge The Endangerment Finding
  • Here in my retirement, my remaining law practice consists almost entirely of working on one case in the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, going by the caption Concerned Household Electricity Consumers Council v. EPA. From time to time when there is a development in the case, I will report on it in a post here.

  • My most recent update on the case was on May 25, when the DC Circuit issued a decision throwing us out on the ground of “standing.” When a case challenges a regulation issued by a government agency, the “standing” doctrine requires that a party bringing the case show some kind of concrete injury from the challenged regulation, which here is EPA’s 2009 determination that CO2 emissions into the atmosphere constitute a “danger to human health and welfare.” Our showing was that the Endangerment Finding forces an onslaught of federal regulations suppressing consumption of fossil fuels; and that policies suppressing fossil fuels have been demonstrated in every jurisdiction that has tried them to lead to large increases in electricity prices.

  • But the court in its wisdom ruled that the plaintiff electricity consumers were not “directly regulated by the challenged rule,” and that we had “fail[ed] to provide any evidence of injury.”

  • I titled my May 25 post, in the aftermath of that decision, as “At CHECC We’re Down But Not Out!” And indeed we have now bounced back!

Read More